Friday, February 8, 2008

Politics of Poison

As noted on Tam's blog:
Kit writes about
Elections and Iocane Powder
"...I used to write about politics all the time. That was back when I thought my “side” could win. I still keep up with the issues, but I’ve come to the same realization that Jayman has - America does not want what I want out of government. America loves big government. They don’t care about taxes and punishing producers and the non-scalability of things like health care and school systems. America wants Big Brother to make them feel safe. America wants Nanny Government to give them money, food, health care, and whatever else America thinks it’s entitled to loot, courtesy of the producers..." (more)

I think that the poison analogy in the post is well aimed.

Rachel Lucas says:
"...What I’m saying is, with this president thing, we are getting a new president. We are getting one and there is nothing in heaven or hell that we can to do to avoid it. The new president will (likely) be either John McCain, the dog that bites you frequently, or Clinton or Obama, dogs that bite you slightly more frequently. You are getting one of these dogs. That is a 100% surety..."

Which dog would you prefer?

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

I prefer my analogy. A guy is holding you at gun point, telling you you can either kill yourself by shooting yourself in the head, or by overdosing on some pills.

Instead, I say "I am not killing myself. If you want me dead, YOU are going to have to shoot me."

Either way I'm dead, but at least I'm not being an active participant in my murder.

BA Moonshadow said...

That's one way of looking at it. Or, you could choose the gun option and then turn it on your captor.